Men's Division II
TeamRecordPower RatingsPR Rank
Mercy5-1011-30.452   79.6386.8616.02301119
Chestnut Hill1-105-70.326   75.0183.0818.45362115
Wingate4-117-80.200   79.7084.9112.01291613
Lake Erie1-115-70.333   75.4082.3116.09352312
Pfeiffer8-910-60.154   82.5787.6811.3320911
Adelphi10-516-30.175   86.6588.904.991156
Limestone12-215-20.025   89.8691.904.04514
Assumption3-108-70.303   80.7882.915.7325223
Molloy5-95-10-0.024   81.9883.694.7022193
Catawba8-812-40.250   83.7685.243.9518153
Saint Michael's6-610-50.167   85.5986.211.9414122
Le Moyne15-212-2-0.025   90.3991.191.50422
Dominican U.2-65-80.135   75.6479.069.1434331
Florida Southern4-97-60.231   83.5784.132.1619181
Mars Hill9-411-40.041   87.2887.891.64981
Seton Hill10-47-7-0.214   85.7985.810.7213130
Grand Canyon1-83-90.139   74.2775.996.003738-1
Franklin Pierce3-82-10-0.106   79.4279.411.723132-1
Merrimack13-311-6-0.165   88.7287.98-1.2867-1
C.W. Post16-116-2-0.052   90.5389.45-2.2534-1
St. Andrews3-107-80.236   79.9580.763.262830-2
S. New Hampshire4-103-9-0.036   81.4981.331.082426-2
Mercyhurst13-114-2-0.054   91.9090.50-3.1113-2
Dominican C.6-92-13-0.267   82.2981.54-0.222124-3
NYIT9-410-40.022   87.9487.30-0.95710-3
Wheeling Jesuit4-104-100.000   80.2480.301.722731-4
American International2-131-13-0.062   79.1278.21-0.013236-4
Bentley9-57-7-0.143   86.9085.62-2.041014-4
Dowling12-211-3-0.071   90.6688.42-4.5726-4
Notre Dame de Namur6-57-8-0.079   81.5380.900.142328-5
Queens U. of Charlotte9-48-5-0.077   85.9884.57-2.141217-5
Belmont Abbey7-65-7-0.122   85.1383.55-2.341520-5
Lees-McRae2-80-10-0.200   78.2775.84-2.883339-6
Saint Anselm6-83-11-0.214   83.9781.52-3.871725-8
Rollins3-92-10-0.083   80.6778.28-3.202635-9
Pace7-75-9-0.143   84.0380.87-5.281629-13
Saint Leo12-35-8-0.415   87.3281.03-12.03827-19


  • Only teams that played in both years are included.  However, power rating (PR) ranks were not altered to account for the differences.

  • Teams with the same PR on ratings pages may have different ranks here (e.g., if two teams have a PR of 84.50 and ratings-page ranks of 27 and 28, respectively, their ranks may be reversed on this page, as ordering in the case of ties is arbitary).

  • Teams are shown in descending order by change in PR rank and then by change in PR.

  • Power rating change accounts for differences in the mean PR and the standard deviation between the two years and cannot be derived by subtraction.

  • Greater change is naturally possible -- and in fact probable -- in the divisions having more teams.

  • If they change, teams ranked towards the extremes last year generally have only one way to go; they can also change the most.
Create a free lacrosse website